Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

20 March 2021: Database Analysis  

Potential Target Genes in the Development of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Bioinformatics Analysis

Liang Liu1CE, Yun Yu1BC, Long-long Hu1D, Quan-bin Dong1D, Feng Hu1D, Ling-juan Zhu1D, Qian Liang1D, Ling-ling Yu1B, Hui-hui Bao1A, Xiao-shu Cheng1A*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.928366

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e928366



BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia worldwide. Although it is not life-threatening, the accompanying rapid and irregular ventricular rate can lead to hemodynamic deterioration and obvious symptoms, especially the risk of cerebrovascular embolism. Our study aimed to identify novel and promising genes that could explain the underlying mechanism of AF development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Expression profiles GSE41177, GSE79768, and GSE14975 were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus Database. R software was used for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses were subsequently performed. A protein–protein interaction network was constructed in Cytoscape software. Next, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model was constructed and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the key genes.

RESULTS: We obtained 204 DEGs from the datasets. The DEGs were mostly involved in immune response and cell communication. The primary pathways of the DEGs were related to the course or maintenance of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases. The top 20 hub genes (high scores in cytoHubba) were selected in the PPI network. Finally, we identified 6 key genes (FCGR3B, CLEC10A, FPR2, IGSF6, S100A9, and S100A12) via the LASSO model.

CONCLUSIONS: We present 6 target genes that are potentially involved in the molecular mechanisms of AF development. In addition, these genes are likely to serve as potential therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, Biological Markers, Immunity, Active, Biomarkers, Tumor, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Gene Expression Profiling, gene ontology, Gene Regulatory Networks, Protein Interaction Mapping, Protein Interaction Maps, Software


Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent (0.51%) and persistent heart rhythm disorder globally [1]. AF, increases the risk of blood clots causing thromboembolism, confers a nearly 5-fold increased risk of a debilitating stroke, and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes, including stroke [2,3]. Given its asymptomatic nature, many cases of AF go undetected until complications occur. Early detection of AF increases the chances of preventing stroke and other complications [4]. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the molecular mechanisms of AF pathogenesis as a means of improving the early diagnosis and treatment interventions of the disease.

Changes in genetic expression in AF are gradually gaining research attention [5,6]. Using the expression profiles of AF-associated target genes as a guide to examine the pathogenic sites of genetic variation and target gene regulation could be an effective approach [7,8]. Population studies show that a positive family history of AF increases the risk of developing AF among first-degree relatives by 30% [9,10]. The search for AF-associated genetic loci is propelled by the existing knowledge on the heritability of AF in the general population. Several genes, including some related to ion channel function, have been revealed to be associated with AF [11]. Ion channel-related genes associated with AF are primarily related to potassium channels. Previous studies have identified specific potassium channel genes or subunits that are associated AF. Monogenic AF pedigrees revealed that mutations leading to the gain or loss of function of KCNQ1, which encodes the potassium channel α subunit, are likely to be involved in the initiation and maintenance of AF [12]. Studies on KCNEI suggested that these AF-related genes are associated with decreased IKs current density and prolonged duration of atrial action potential [13,14]. Analysis of a genome cohort with sporadic AF identified that KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 were associated with AF through a gain-of-function mutation in the IKACh channel [15]. Other studies have found that the CRP gene promoter associated with triallelic polymorphism is a potential genetic predictor of thromboembolic stroke in AF patients [16,17]. In addition, the redistribution and density change of gap junction channels trigger changes in the corresponding conduction velocity and anisotropic conduction, thus creating the re-entry loop of arrhythmias [18]. Several studies have explored the contribution of connexins to AF. At the preclinical stage, heterogeneity and decreased expression of connexins have been observed in AF [19]. Indeed, deletion of mouse homologues of AF-related regions in mice led to reduced expression of Cx43 [7]. Studies have also linked the expression of tumor-related genes with AF, and these genes often function as sentinel molecules in monitoring inflammatory responses and tissue homeostasis [20]. For example, the action potential duration in atrial myocytes was significantly shortened after the knockdown of esophageal cancer-related gene-4 (ECRG4) [21]. Knockdown of ECRG4 activated inflammatory pathways, as well as the genes associated with cardiac remodeling, which may shed light on the maintenance of re-entrant circuits in AF [22]. However, a causal relationship between ECRG4 and AF has not been established in vivo. Although many genes potentially related to AF have been explored, detailed molecular mechanisms behind the initiation, perpetuation, and maintenance of AF remain elusive because of the complex nature of AF pathogenesis and the focus on single families in previous studies. Currently, the understanding and applicability of genes associated with AF are imperfect.

In the present study, based on a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis, we identified DEGs between sinus rhythm (SR) and AF samples, and further elucidated their potential molecular mechanisms and pathology in AF. This study adds several new candidate genes and related molecular pathways to those already associated with AF in previous studies. In future studies, these candidate genes and pathways could be investigated more closely to identify new and clear gene targets and potentially provide guidance for subsequent clinical studies.

Material and Methods


The gene expression profiles of the GSE41177, GSE79768, and GSE14975 datasets were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database (NCBI GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo). The datasets contained data from AF patients with persistent AF for >3 months and SR patients without AF and not using any anti-arrhythmia drugs, with the latter serving as a control group. The GSE41177 dataset comprised 32 atrial appendage tissues from patients with persistent AF and 6 cases with SR. The GSE79768 and GSE14975 datasets consisted of atrial appendage tissues from 14 AF and 12 SR cases and 5 AF and 5 SR cases, respectively. The microarray data from GSE41177, GSE79768, and GSE14975 were based on the GPL570 platform (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array, HG-U133_Plus_2). The raw data were processed and analyzed in R (version 3.6.2). First, the raw data underwent background correction with the limma package (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/limma/). Then, a robust multichip average was created and perfect matches from the raw data were log2 transformed. Afterwards, batch normalization and data merging for the 3 datasets was conducted using the sva package (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/sva/).


Gene annotation was conducted before the analysis of the DEGs between AF and SR samples. The probe identification numbers of the merged data were matched with the gene symbols using the affy package (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/affy/). If multiple probes were mapped to the same gene, the median of the expression value was selected as the gene expression value. Next, we utilized the limma package to identify the DEGs, and the cutoff criteria were set at an adjusted P-value (adj. P) <0.05 and an absolute value of log fold change (|log2 FC|) >1. We apply adj. P to correct false positives. The data for the listed DEGs were processed and plotted in a heatmap and volcano plots using the pheatmap and ggplot2 R packages, respectively.


Based on the analysis of DEGs, added potential functional annotations in Functional Enrichment analysis tool (Funrich) were performed. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis, included biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), and molecular function (MF). In addition, the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, version 6.8, https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was applied to analyze the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment. DAVID is a biological information database with gene annotation, gene symbol conversion, visualization, and integrated discovery function, and it provides comprehensive and systematic biological function annotation information of genes. Subsequently, we visualized the KEGG pathway analyses using the ggplot2 R package. The cutoff criterion was set at adj. P<0.05.


The protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks of the DEGs were analyzed using the STRING online database (version 10.5; http://string-db.org/) to predict PPIs and protein functional associations. A confidence score of ≥0.4 was set as the threshold. After that, Cytoscape software (version 3.7.2; http://cytoscape.org/) was used to analyze and visualize the biological networks and node degrees of DEGs. The cytoHubba plugin (version 0.1) was utilized to identify the PPI networks. Based on the 4 filtering algorithms (Stress, Closeness, EcCentricity, and MCC), the top 20 hub genes obtained by each algorithm were used. Subsequently, co-expression of the hub genes and enrichment genes in the pathways was identified and presented in a Venn diagram.


Based on the hub genes, we constructed a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model because of its strong predictive value using the glmnet package (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/glmnet/). Then, the expression data of the hub genes, based on the ratio 7: 3, were randomly allocated to the training and testing sets. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted using the pROC package in R. The value of ROC area under the curve (AUC) was obtained to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the key genes screened by the LASSO model.



We obtained the microarray datasets GSE41177, GSE79768, and GSE14975 from the GEO database. The datasets contained 51 AF and 23 SR samples. With the cutoff criteria set at adj. P<0.05 and |log2 FC| >1, we identified 204 DEGs (Figure 1). Compared with the control SR differential genes in the datasets, AF-related genes were mostly upregulated. The expression heatmaps of the DEGs are shown in Figure 1A, 1B. These genes were well clustered between the AF and control cases.


We identified the DEGs for the GO analysis using the Funrich software, and the DEGs were examined based on 3 categories: BP, CC, and MF. In the BP group, the DEGs were mainly enriched in immune response, cell communication, and signal transduction; in the CC group, the DEGs were primarily enriched in plasma membrane and exosomes; and in the MF group, the enrichment of the DEGs was mostly in the receptor activity, MHC class I receptor activity, and MHC class II receptor activity (Figure 2A–2C, Table 1).


The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed for the DEGs, and the results are shown in Figure 2D and Table 2. Enrichment of the DEGs was mainly in the Staphylococcus aureus infection, intestinal immune network for IgA production, systemic lupus erythematosus, asthma, and viral myocarditis.


Using the STRING database and Cytoscape software, we constructed 4 PPI networks for the DEGs as shown in Figure 3A–3E. Furthermore, the top 20 hub genes of each dataset were identified using the 4 algorithms (Stress, Closeness, EcCentricity, and MCC) of the cytoHubba plugin. Among these hub genes, SPI1, HCK, TLR8, FPR2, RAC2, IGSF6, CSF3R, CXCR4, S100A8, S100A9, FCGR3B, TYROBP, S100A12, and CLEC10A exhibited the highest degree of association with AF and are listed in the Venn diagram (Figure 3F).


The construction of a LASSO model was based on the A gene expression profile of the 14 hub genes (Figure 4A). Based on the model, 6 genes were identified according to the regression coefficients that were not equal to zero. ROC curve analysis (Figure 4B, 4C) identified the AUC for FCGR3B, CLEC10A, FPR2, IGSF6, S100A9, and S100A12 in AF patients and normal controls; in the training set, the AUC values were 0.9981 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.993–1), 0.9944 (95% CI, 0.9821–1), 0.987 (95% CI, 0.9655–1), 0.9481 (95% CI, 0.8566–1), 0.9852 (95% CI, 0.9616–1), and 0.9981 (95% CI, 0.993–1); in the test set, the AUC values were 0.8762 (95% CI, 0.7271–1), 0.9714 (95% CI, 0.9079–1), 0.981 (95% CI, 0.9358–1), 0.8857 (95% CI, 0.7092–1), 0.8952 (95% CI, 0.7517–1), and 0.9429 (95% CI, 0.825–1).


The initiation and development of AF are regulated by the expression of many genes. Here, we systematically investigated gene expression profiles obtained from AF microarray studies. Gene expression data were downloaded from 3 GEO datasets in the GCBI. To better explore the DEGs, we identified the potential and remarkable DEGs, biological pathways, and processes based on comparisons between AF and normal SR samples.

GO analysis revealed that a considerable number of the co-expressed DEGs were primarily associated with immune response, cell communication, signal transduction, plasma membrane, exosomes, receptor activity, MHC class I receptor activity, and MHC class II receptor activity. Previous studies indicated that the immune response can be a complex and powerful factor in the pathophysiological process of AF and its concomitant complications [23,24]. The major immune cells found in the left atrial appendages of patients with AF were immunologically active monocytes and macrophages, suggesting a proinflammatory state characterized by increased infiltration of iNOS-positive, but Arg1-negative immune cells [25,26]. AF-induced cardiac injury processes of the myocardium initiate a cardiac immune response as shown by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as extracellular matrix and reactive oxygen species [27]. The pattern recognition receptor then initiates recognition of DAMPs, before the activation of innate and adaptive immune cells. This immune process forms a long-term feedback loop and promotes the formation of permanent forms of AF [28]. Inflammation and immune response are dependent on the onset and maintenance of AF, which is in turn dependent on inflammation and immune response. In addition, a clinical phenomenon that AF promotes inflammation supports a vicious cycle of “AF begets AF” [29]. The results of our pathway analysis showed that the DEGs identified were mainly associated with the course or maintenance of autoimmune diseases and chronic inflammatory diseases. Multiple systems of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, may be an independent risk factor for AF since SLE has cardiac manifestations. Recent studies have shown that the disease status of SLE is independently associated with AF after adjusting for age, sex, race, and coronary artery disease [30]. Moreover, systemic inflammation and disease pathways of chronic inflammatory diseases are considered as pathogenic contributors to the initiation and development of AF [31,32]. Chemokines guide the migration and activation of systemic leukocytes and may influence AF development [33]. Some studies have suggested that the level of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines is related to the progression of AF to myocardial fibrosis [34]. The expression of cytokines in AF promotes the degree of the recruitment of immune cells [35]. As a classic way related in immune reaction, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and interleukin (IL)-6 were expressed more frequently in the atria of macrophages after migration in AF [36].

Further analysis of the co-expression genes in the PPI network and LASSO model identified 6 key genes (FCGR3B, CLEC10A, FPR2, IGSF6, S100A9, and S100A12) as the most significance. Among the key genes, FCGR3B showed a closer association with AF. FCGR3B encodes a low-affinity receptor for the Fc portion of gamma immunoglobulins (IgG) known as FcγRIIIb (CD16b). The FcγRIIIb can bind either the monomeric or aggregated IgG, and it may function to capture dedicated immune complexes in the peripheral circulation [37]. On neutrophils, FcγRIIIb regulates immune responses [38]. Our findings provide strong evidence that recruitment of neutrophils, particularly polymorphonuclear neutrophils, promotes the development of AF [39,40]. Human FcγRIIIb lacks intracellular signaling motifs and is anchored in the cell membrane via a glycophosphatidyl inositol anchor [41]. In addition, intracellular signaling promotes phagocytosis of antibody-opsonized microbes by human neutrophils through FcγRIIIb in collaboration with other associated FcγR [42]. In the rapid adhesion of neutrophils to endothelial cells, FcγRIIIb binding immune complexes remains an important link [43]. Thus, this gene is involved in the recruitment and activation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils at the site of inflammation [44].

Although the potential role of FCGR3B in autoimmunity has been extensively investigated, its role in AF development remains unclear [45]. The protein interacts with the Fc portion of the IgG molecule involved in immune regulation. Moreover, the variation of FCGR3B copy numbers is associated with susceptibility to several autoimmune diseases [46]. Importantly, FCGR3B could be linked to cardiovascular disorder of the myocardium and coronary heart disease [47]. In addition, CD16+ monocytes have been shown to be involved in atrial remodeling in the pathophysiology of AF [48]. Therefore, the FCGR3B gene could be a potential biomarker for AF.

CLEC10A is one of the members of the c-type lectin domain family 12, which serves as a characteristic galactose lectin on macrophages and dendritic cells. CLEC10A can be activated through Toll-like receptor signaling and increase the secretion of various cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-8, and IL-10 [49]. In addition, lectin has been linked to the development of AF, and it can particularly predict thrombosis and left atrial appendage remodeling in patients with AF [50]. A synergistic interaction exists between lectin and TGF-β1, which can induce AF by activating the TGF-β1/Smad pathway in patients with AF [51]. Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) belong to a G-protein-coupled chemokine receptor family and include 3 subtypes (FPR1, FPR2, and FPR3) that play important roles in host defense and inflammation [52]. FPR2 is involved in the initiation and resolution of inflammation. Similarly, the FPR2 signaling has important vascular effects through the inflammatory response [53,54].


In summary, we used bioinformatics analysis tools to delineate the pathomechanism of AF based on DEGs. Autoimmune and chronic inflammatory pathways, neutrophil chemotaxis, and immune response were confirmed to play roles in the development of AF. In addition, 6 genes, including FCGR3B, CLEC10A, FPR2, IGSF6, S100A9, and S100A12 were identified as potential AF biomarkers. Our findings pave the way for further research on AF occurrence and development.

There are some limitations of our study. First, the clinical atrial tissue samples were not analyzed in the laboratory. Therefore, future studies on the mechanism of AF occurrence and development should incorporate such samples. In addition, given the current limited datasets, the sample sizes were relatively small and a multicenter study involving a larger sample size is needed. Further investigation is required to determine whether the 6 key genes (FCGR3B, CLEC10A, FPR2, IGSF6, S100A9, and S100A12) activate any of the pathways or other mechanisms known to induce AF in humans.


1. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Cervellin G, Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: An increasing epidemic and public health challenge: Int J Stroke, 2020 [Online ahead of print]

2. Soo Y, Chan N, Leung KT, Age-specific trends of atrial fibrillation-related ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack, anticoagulant use and risk factor profile in Chinese population: A 15-year study: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2017; 88(9); 744-48

3. Wang X, Fu Q, Song F, Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in different socioeconomic regions of China and its association with stroke: Results from a national stroke screening survey: Int J Cardiol, 2018; 271; 92-97

4. Esato M, Chun YH, An Y, Clinical impact of asymptomatic presentation status in patients with paroxysmal and sustained atrial fibrillation: The Fushimi AF Registry: Chest, 2017; 152(6); 1266-75

5. Hucker WJ, Hanley A, Ellinor PT, Improving atrial fibrillation therapy: Is there a gene for that?: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2017; 69(16); 2088-95

6. Roberts JD, Gollob MH, A contemporary review on the genetic basis of atrial fibrillation: Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J, 2014; 10(1); 18-24

7. van Ouwerkerk AF, Bosada FM, van Duijvenboden K, Identification of atrial fibrillation associated genes and functional non-coding variants: Nat Commun, 2019; 10(1); 4755

8. Zhang M, Hill MC, Kadow ZA, Long-range Pitx2c enhancer-promoter interactions prevent predisposition to atrial fibrillation: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2019; 116(45); 22692-98

9. McAlister FA, Yan L, Roos LL, Lix LM, Parental atrial fibrillation and stroke or atrial fibrillation in young adults: Stroke, 2019; 50(9); 2322-28

10. Fox CS, Parise H, D’Agostino RS, Parental atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in offspring: JAMA, 2004; 291(23); 2851-55

11. Campbell HM, Wehrens X, Genetics of atrial fibrillation: An update: Curr Opin Cardiol, 2018; 33(3); 304-10

12. Chen YH, Xu SJ, Bendahhou S, KCNQ1 gain-of-function mutation in familial atrial fibrillation: Science, 2003; 299(5604); 251-54

13. Voudris KV, Apostolakis S, Karyofillis P, Genetic diversity of the KCNE1 gene and susceptibility to postoperative atrial fibrillation: Am Heart J, 2014; 167(2); 274-80.e1

14. Olesen MS, Bentzen BH, Nielsen JB, Mutations in the potassium channel subunit KCNE1 are associated with early-onset familial atrial fibrillation: BMC Med Genet, 2012; 13; 24

15. Yamada N, Asano Y, Fujita M, Mutant KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 potassium channels as novel molecular targets in bradyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation: Circulation, 2019; 139(18); 2157-69

16. Chang SN, Tsai CT, Wu CK, A functional variant in the promoter region regulates the C-reactive protein gene and is a potential candidate for increased risk of atrial fibrillation: J Intern Med, 2012; 272(3); 305-15

17. Chang SN, Lai LP, Chiang FT, C-reactive protein gene polymorphism predicts the risk of thromboembolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: A more than 10-year prospective follow-up study: J Thromb Haemost, 2017; 15(8); 1541-46

18. Beyer EC, Berthoud VM, Gap junction gene and protein families: Connexins, innexins, and pannexins: Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr, 2018; 1860(1); 5-8

19. Bikou O, Thomas D, Trappe K, Connexin 43 gene therapy prevents persistent atrial fibrillation in a porcine model: Cardiovasc Res, 2011; 92(2); 218-25

20. Mao L, Huang W, Zou P, The unrecognized role of tumor suppressor genes in atrial fibrillation: Gene, 2018; 642; 26-31

21. Zhou R, Liu Y, Huang W, Dang X, Potential functions of esophageal cancer-related gene-4 in the cardiovascular system: Front Med, 2019; 13(6); 639-45

22. Huang L, Yu H, Fan X, A potential role of esophageal cancer related gene-4 for atrial fibrillation: Sci Rep, 2017; 7(1); 2717

23. Liu Y, Shi Q, Ma Y, Liu Q, The role of immune cells in atrial fibrillation: J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2018; 123; 198-208

24. Hu YF, Chen YJ, Lin YJ, Chen SA, Inflammation and the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation: Nat Rev Cardiol, 2015; 12(4); 230-43

25. Yamashita T, Sekiguchi A, Iwasaki YK, Recruitment of immune cells across atrial endocardium in human atrial fibrillation: Circ J, 2010; 74(2); 262-70

26. Sun Z, Zhou D, Xie X, Cross-talk between macrophages and atrial myocytes in atrial fibrillation: Basic Res Cardiol, 2016; 111(6); 63

27. Tousoulis D, Zisimos K, Antoniades C, Oxidative stress and inflammatory process in patients with atrial fibrillation: The role of left atrium distension: Int J Cardiol, 2009; 136(3); 258-62

28. Boos CJ, Infection and atrial fibrillation: Inflammation begets AF: Eur Heart J, 2020; 41(10); 1120-22

29. Lo LW, Chang HY, Scherlag BJ, Temporary suppression of cardiac ganglionated plexi leads to long-term suppression of atrial fibrillation: Evidence of early autonomic intervention to break the vicious cycle of “AF begets AF”: J Am Heart Assoc, 2016; 5(7); e003309

30. Barnado A, Carroll RJ, Casey C, Phenome-wide association studies uncover a novel association of increased atrial fibrillation in male patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2018; 70(11); 1630-36

31. Guo Y, Lip GY, Apostolakis S, Inflammation in atrial fibrillation: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012; 60(22); 2263-70

32. Aviles RJ, Martin DO, Apperson-Hansen C, Inflammation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation: Circulation, 2003; 108(24); 3006-10

33. Huang J, Wu N, Xiang Y, Prognostic value of chemokines in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: Int J Cardiol, 2020; 320; 83-89

34. Abe I, Teshima Y, Kondo H, Association of fibrotic remodeling and cytokines/chemokines content in epicardial adipose tissue with atrial myocardial fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: Heart Rhythm, 2018; 15(11); 1717-27

35. Aulin J, Siegbahn A, Hijazi Z, Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein and risk for death and cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation: Am Heart J, 2015; 170(6); 1151-60

36. Yamashita T, Sekiguchi A, Iwasaki YK, Recruitment of immune cells across atrial endocardium in human atrial fibrillation: Circ J, 2010; 74(2); 262-70

37. Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV, Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses: Nat Rev Immunol, 2008; 8(1); 34-47

38. Weber F, Breustedt D, Schlicht S, First infusion reactions are mediated by FcγRIIIb and neutrophils: Pharm Res, 2018; 35(9); 169

39. Ishii Y, Schuessler RB, Gaynor SL, Inflammation of atrium after cardiac surgery is associated with inhomogeneity of atrial conduction and atrial fibrillation: Circulation, 2005; 111(22); 2881-88

40. Schuessler RB, Ishii Y, Khagi Y, The effects of inflammation on heart rate and rhythm in a canine model of cardiac surgery: Heart Rhythm, 2012; 9(3); 432-39

41. Treffers LW, van Houdt M, Bruggeman CW, FcγRIIIb restricts antibody-dependent destruction of cancer cells by human neutrophils: Front Immunol, 2018; 9; 3124

42. Bournazos S, Bournazou I, Murchison JT, Copy number variation of FCGR3B is associated with susceptibility to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Respiration, 2011; 81(2); 142-49

43. Coxon A, Cullere X, Knight S, Fc gamma RIII mediates neutrophil recruitment to immune complexes. A mechanism for neutrophil accumulation in immune-mediated inflammation: Immunity, 2001; 14(6); 693-704

44. McKinney C, Broen JC, Vonk MC, Evidence that deletion at FCGR3B is a risk factor for systemic sclerosis: Genes Immun, 2012; 13(6); 458-60

45. Fanciulli M, Norsworthy PJ, Petretto E, FCGR3B copy number variation is associated with susceptibility to systemic, but not organ-specific, autoimmunity: Nat Genet, 2007; 39(6); 721-23

46. Lee YH, Bae SC, Seo YH, Association between FCGR3B copy number variations and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases: A meta-analysis: Inflamm Res, 2015; 64(12); 983-91

47. Zaghlool SB, Kuhnel B, Elhadad MA, Epigenetics meets proteomics in an epigenome-wide association study with circulating blood plasma protein traits: Nat Commun, 2020; 11(1); 15

48. Suzuki A, Fukuzawa K, Yamashita T, Circulating intermediate CD14++CD16+monocytes are increased in patients with atrial fibrillation and reflect the functional remodelling of the left atrium: Europace, 2017; 19(1); 40-47

49. Heger L, Balk S, Luhr JJ, CLEC10A is a specific marker for human CD1c(+) dendritic cells and enhances their Toll-like receptor 7/8-induced cytokine secretion: Front Immunol, 2018; 9; 744

50. Tang Z, Zeng L, Lin Y, Circulating galectin-3 is associated with left atrial appendage remodelling and thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation: Heart Lung Circ, 2019; 28(6); 923-31

51. Xiao M, Zhang M, Bie M, Galectin-3 induces atrial fibrosis by activating the TGF-beta1/Smad pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: Cardiology, 2020; 145(7); 446-55

52. Senchenkova EY, Ansari J, Becker F, Novel role for the AnxA1-Fpr2/ALX signaling axis as a key regulator of platelet function to promote resolution of inflammation: Circulation, 2019; 140(4); 319-35

53. Petri MH, Laguna-Fernández A, Gonzalez-Diez M, The role of the FPR2/ALX receptor in atherosclerosis development and plaque stability: Cardiovasc Res, 2015; 105(1); 65-74

54. Kain V, Jadapalli JK, Tourki B, Halade GV, Inhibition of FPR2 impaired leukocytes recruitment and elicited non-resolving inflammation in acute heart failure: Pharmacol Res, 2019; 146; 104295

In Press

19 Feb 2024 : Clinical Research  

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ileocolic Artery and Vein Diameter for Acute Appendicitis

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943846  


23 Feb 2024 : Clinical Research  

Early Mobilization in Pediatric Critical Care: Exploring the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Saudi Arabia

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942467  


01 Feb 2024 : Review article  

Enhancing Patient Adherence to Newly-Prescribed Medicine for Chronic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review and C...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942923  

10 Jan 2024 : Clinical Research  

Efficacy of Bakri Intrauterine Balloon in Managing Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Comparative Analysis of Vaginal...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943072  

Most Viewed Current Articles

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research  

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387


17 Jan 2024 : Review article  

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799


14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research  

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990


01 Jan 2022 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952


Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750