Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 October 2003

A comparison of remifentanil in paediatric and adult anaesthesia

Tomasz Gaszyński, Paweł Krajewski, Andrzej Piotrowski, Wojciech Gaszyński

Med Sci Monit 2003; 9(5): 56-57 :: ID: 428734

Abstract

Background: Anaesthesia for children and adults are different in many aspects,one of them beeing dosage of anaesthestics.We decided to compare the doses of remifentanil infusion required for adults and children undergoing procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery, as well as ear,throat and nose surgery. Material/Methods: 18 paediatric and 21 adult patients were anaesthetised with infusion of remifentanil 0.5 mcg/kg/min,after a bolus of 1 mcg/kg given during induction.Other drugs:thiopentone,atracurium and midazolam were administered according to the typical rules of administration in children or adult population.Total doses of remifentanil in mcg/kg/min were calculated and compared.Postanaesthesia recovery profile and requirement for postoperative analgesia were also compared. Results: No significant difference was found between doses:0.67 and 0.57 mcg kg/min for children and adults respectively.There was no difference in recovery profile,but higher level of nausea and vomiting (55%vs.28.6%)and postoperative pain score (0.89 vs. 0.43)was observed in children. This may be explained by lower tolerance of nausea and pain in this group of patients.Conclusions: There is no important difference in dosage of remifentanil calculated on continuous infusion rate between children and adults.

Keywords: opioids:remifentanil, pharmacology:adults, children:general anaesthesia, intravenous anaesthesia

Add Comment 0 Comments

Editorial

01 November 2024 : Editorial  

Editorial: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Digital Image Analysis, and the Future of Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis

Dinah V. Parums

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947038

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e947038

0:00

In Press

Clinical Research  

Clinical Outcomes of Talus Bone Marrow Edema: Comparing Plaster Cast, Crutches, and Walking Boot Treatments

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946072  

Review article  

Comprehensive Insights into Arecoline Hydrobromide: Pharmacology, Toxicity, and Pharmacokinetics

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945582  

Clinical Research  

Iliac Periosteal Bone Autografting vs Talus Non-Weight-Bearing Surgery in Hepple V Talus Osteochondral Inju...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944912  

Clinical Research  

Impact of Different Orthodontic Appliances on Mandibular Condyle, Anterior Region of Mandibular, and Maxill...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946265  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   6,335,406

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   1,908,931

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   695,409

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

07 Jan 2022 : Meta-Analysis   260,542

Efficacy and Safety of Light Therapy as a Home Treatment for Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Dise...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935074

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935074

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750