Comparison of the Performance of 24 Early Warning Scores with the Updated National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for Predicting Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission in Postoperative Brain Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center

Lingli Peng; Zhen Luo; Lingling Liang; Mingming Liu; Lingyao Meng; Jianwen Tan; Lili Song; Yan Zhang; Lixiang Wu

doi:10.12659/MSM.929168

02 March 2021: Clinical Research

Comparison of the Performance of 24 Early Warning Scores with the Updated National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for Predicting Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission in Postoperative Brain Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center

Lingli Peng ^12AEFG , Zhen Luo ^3CE , Lingling Liang ^4BG , Mingming Liu ^3B , Lingyao Meng ^3B , Jianwen Tan ^5B , Lili Song ^3BF , Yan Zhang ^3AD* , Lixiang Wu ^1AD*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.929168

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e929168

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

View HTML version

Table 5 Evaluation value of the NEWS2 and the 24 other EWSs in the study.

System number	AUROC	95% CI	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value	Youden index	Cut-off value
1	0.870	0.822–0.919	0.710	0.879	0.613	0.919	0.589	4
2	0.860	0.814–0.907	0.768	0.774	0.477	0.926	0.542	7
3	0.852	0.804–0.900	0.739	0.774	0.468	0.917	0.513	7
4	0.851	0.803–0.899	0.739	0.763	0.455	0.916	0.502	4
5	0.850	0.796–0.904	0.783	0.751	0.458	0.928	0.534	3
6	0.845	0.790–0.901	0.812	0.735	0.452	0.936	0.547	3
7	0.843	0.789–0.897	0.696	0.852	0.558	0.913	0.548	4
8	0.837	0.783–0.892	0.783	0.728	0.435	0.926	0.511	4
9	0.836	0.781–0.892	0.638	0.875	0.579	0.900	0.513	4
10	0.832	0.777–0.888	0.609	0.875	0.568	0.893	0.484	5
11	0.831	0.776–0.887	0.667	0.802	0.474	0.900	0.469	4
12	0.826	0.769–0.884	0.812	0.735	0.452	0.936	0.547	3
13	0.824	0.766–0.883	0.580	0.914	0.645	0.890	0.494	5
14	0.822	0.764–0.879	0.609	0.879	0.575	0.893	0.488	5
15	0.811	0.748–0.873	0.551	0.934	0.691	0.886	0.485	7
16	0.811	0.750–0.872	0.536	0.930	0.673	0.882	0.466	5
17	0.808	0.748–0.868	0.696	0.767	0.444	0.904	0.463	4
18	0.807	0.746–0.868	0.580	0.883	0.571	0.887	0.463	5
19	0.807	0.747–0.867	0.696	0.767	0.444	0.904	0.463	4
20	0.806	0.745–0.867	0.725	0.735	0.424	0.909	0.460	4
21	0.805	0.744–0.866	0.725	0.735	0.424	0.909	0.460	4
22	0.800	0.739–0.861	0.594	0.872	0.554	0.889	0.466	5
23	0.762	0.690–0.835	0.623	0.802	0.457	0.888	0.425	4
24	0.738	0.667–0.809	0.507	0.883	0.538	0.870	0.390	7
25	0.737	0.664–0.809	0.493	0.852	0.472	0.862	0.345	3
NEWS2 – National Early Warning Score 2; EWS – Early Warning Score; AUROC – area under the receiver operator characteristic curve.

Back to the Article

Comparison of the Performance of 24 Early Warning Scores with the Updated National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for Predicting Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission in Postoperative Brain Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Study at a Single Center

Your Privacy