Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

10 March 2023: Clinical Research  

Balloon Dilation Eustachian Tuboplasty Combined with Tympanotomy Tube Insertion for Treatment of Refractory Otitis Media with Effusion: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial Comparing Local Anesthesia Combined Sedation Versus General Anesthesia

Bingyi Dai1ABCDE, Xiao Yin1BF, Danni Guo ORCID logo1ABCDEFG, Xiaodong Du1ADEF*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938879

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e938879

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balloon dilation eustachian tuboplasty (BET) is used to treat eustachian dysfunction but its therapeutic effect and cost-effectiveness when combined with tympanotomy tube insertion (TBI) on refractory otitis media with effusion under local anesthesia with sedation compared to traditional general anesthesia are not well understood.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients with refractory secretory otitis media who received BET+TBI were enrolled in this study and randomized into the local anesthesia with sedation group (n=20) and general anesthesia group (n=20). Tympanometry (TMM), 7-item eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire (ETDQ-7) results, intraoperative anesthesia accidents, and operation costs were compared between the groups.

RESULTS: Patients in the local anesthesia with sedation group exhibited intraoperative awareness and pain. Differences in TMM, ETDQ-7 results, and postoperative VAS scores between the groups were comparable (P>0.05). Notably, operative time and treatment costs in the local anesthesia group were lower compared with general anesthesia group.

CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effects and safety of local anesthesia and general anesthesia under BET combined with TBI for treatment of refractory otitis media with effusion are comparable. However, further studies should aim at reducing pain and discomfort.

Keywords: Otitis Media with Effusion, Anesthesia, Local, Eustachian Tube

Background

Refractory otitis media with effusion (ROME) is a common disorder in ENT clinics. It is characterized by aural fullness and hearing loss, and it often leads to tympanic atelectasis and adhesive otitis media. In adults, it has a low prevalence (approximately 0.55–1%) [1]. Most ROME cases in adults are due to eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) [2]. Traditional treatment options for ROME include medicines such as antibiotics, nasal steroids, and decongestants, physical training such as Valsalva maneuver, or surgical processes such as tympanic paracentesis (TP) or placement of a grommet to treat ETD [3]. However, these therapeutic approaches are not effective.

Balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) under general anesthesia is a therapeutic option with promising short-term results for ETD. It is a minimally invasive, simple, and safe approach [4–8]. Good treatment outcomes for ROME using BET and tympanostomy tube insertion (TBI) have been reported. BET+TBI was initially performed under general anesthesia [4]. However, there has been increased interest in performing the procedure in office settings under local anesthesia, and the feasibility of such an approach has been reported in recent years with varying local anesthesia protocols. However, there is a need to improve the technique [9,10]. In some areas, BET and TBI are still mainly performed under general anesthesia. Catalano et al first established the feasibility of BET under local anesthesia in 2012 [11]. Performing BET under local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) instead of general anesthesia confers the advantages of improved patient safety, faster patient recovery, and reduced treatment costs [12].

This study aimed to compare the clinical effects, safety, and cost-effectiveness of BET combined with TBI on ROME under local anesthesia with MAC vs general anesthesia.

Material and Methods

STUDY PARTICIPANTS:

This was a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. In total, 40 adults (age range=18–56 years) – 23 males (28 ears, including 5 binaural cases and 18 monaural cases) and 17 females (20 ears, including 3 binaural cases and 14 monaural cases) – were enrolled from December 2020 to November 2021 at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University. Patients with ROME diagnosed at least 6 months earlier were randomized based on computer software-assigned numbers allocated into 2 groups: the BET+TBI under local anesthesia group (Study group, 20 patients with 25 ears, including 5 binaural cases) and the BET+TBI under general anesthesia group (Control group, 20 patients with 23 ears, including 3 binaural cases). Eustachian tube dysfunction was diagnosed with tympanometry (TMM), the 7-item eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire (ETDQ-7), and visual analog scale (VAS) with a 0–10 scale (0, no discomfort; 10, worst possible discomfort) [13]. Differences in gender, age, and disease duration since diagnosis between the groups were insignificant. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University (Ethics Approval Number: 2020023). All patients provided a signed informed consent form before enrollment.

INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

The inclusion criteria for this study were:

The exclusion criteria were:

OPERATION PROCEDURES:

For surgical procedures under local anesthesia with MAC, all patients were administered 15 mg/kg (1 g maximum) paracetamol according to their body weight before the procedure. The upper-limb venous access was opened and intravenously perfused with dexmetomidine at 1 μg/kg/h during the procedure for sedation. For patients experiencing unbearable pain, 5 ml of Dezocine was intravenously injected. For nasal nerve block, the nasal cavity was filled with cotton sheet supplemented with 3 ml of 0.1% adrenaline and 20 ml 1% tetracaine for about 15 to 20 min. The filling sites were the middle nasal meatus, olfactory sulcus, meatus nasi communis, nasopharynx, inferior nasal meatus, and nasal septum mucosa, among others. For local anesthesia and lubrication, 1 ml of lidocaine-prilocaine cream was applied to the eustachian tube lumen under endoscopy for 5 min. The endoscope was inserted into the ipsilateral nostril with the balloon dilatation catheter. If the nose was too narrow for both the endoscope and balloon dilatation catheter to pass, a 45° angulated endoscope was inserted in the contralateral nostril to visualize the eustachian tube orifice. Surgical techniques for BET+TBI were performed as previously described [14]. A balloon catheter (Carefree, Guangzhou Manxiang Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., China) was inserted into the ET with endoscopic assistance (0- or 30-degree view angle). The balloon was inflated with sterile water with a pressure of 10 bars for 2 min. After termination of inflation, the deflated balloon catheter was removed and the catheter tip was positioned correctly. After the procedures, the pharyngeal ostium of the eustachian tube was observed to be smooth and the openings enlarged without breakage (Figure 3). Then, the patients were instructed to turn the head to one side and, while keeping the affected ear up, perform the Valsalva maneuver. If entire tympanic atelectasis was restored when assessed by optic endoscopy, BET was proven effective and the patient would then undergo the TBI procedure (Figure 4). For general anesthesia, TBI was performed before BET and without the Valsalva maneuver.

QUESTIONNAIRE:

Once patients returned to the ward after the operation, they were asked to complete a questionnaire evaluating their operation experiences. The questionnaires were administered when patients felt comfortable. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation to observe the ventilation and tympanic membrane. ETDQ-7 results and VAS scores were recorded at each follow-up.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

All analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 software. The t test and LSD test were used for comparison of outcomes between the groups and for multiple comparisons, respectively. Changes in outcome between the preoperative period and postoperative period were assessed using the mixed effects regression model. P<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

All patients successfully completed the BET+TBI procedure without any intraoperative anesthesia accidents, such as cardiopulmonary receptor reflex or marked fluctuations in blood oxygen levels, heart rate, or blood pressure. No difference in bleeding or abnormal patency of the eustachian tube or any other complications were observed between the groups. BET+TBI under local anesthesia with MAC was associated with higher discomfort compared with the general anesthesia group (mean VAS score=5.2±0.6 vs 0, P<0.0001) (Table 1), but had less postoperative discomfort when patients were awake (3.5±0.8 vs 2.3±0.8, P=0.049). About 90% and 95% of patients in MAC and general anesthesia groups, respectively, stated that anesthesia and pain relief were sufficient, with no significant difference between the groups. One patient reported discomfort under local anesthesia but no discomfort under MAC.

Three months after surgery, ETDQ-7 scores and R-values of TMM were significantly improved in both groups compared with preoperative scores (P<0.01) (Tables 2, 3). However, ETDQ-7 scores and TMM results between the 2 groups were not significantly different (P>0.05) (Figure 5, Tables 2, 3). Twelve months after the procedure, all tympanic membrane catheters were shed, and all tympanic membranes were integral under the otoscope (Figure 6).

The average total duration of the operation under local anesthesia was 49±17.26 min, whereas the total duration of anesthesia and operation in the general anesthesia group was 125.7±17.36 min, which significantly shortened the operation time (P<0.0001) (Table 4). In addition, the hospitalization costs in the local anesthesia group were lower than those in the general anesthesia group (P<0.0001) (Table 4).

Discussion

Since Catalano et al successfully performed BET under local anesthesia in 2012, this procedure has gradually become popular, but general anesthesia is still being used in many places [11]. In this study, we found that BET can be safely performed with MAC at a pressure of 10 to 12 atm and a dilatation time of 2 min. Our results are consistent with those reported by Veera et al, who reported that BET under MAC can be safely and effectively performed [15].

In this study, patients underwent surgery under local anesthesia while still awake, and reported mild nervousness and discomfort. However, since they were awake, they could communicate their discomfort for timely interventions during the operation. In this study, 19 patients in the local anesthesia with MAC group reported that the procedure provided adequate pain relief, whereas 1 patient reported the operation was uncomfortable during a retrospective review of the procedure. Further, all patients in the local anesthesia with MAC group reported complete relief from all discomfort within 1–2 h after the procedure. However, the experience of pain or discomfort during the operation in the local anesthesia group compared with the general anesthesia group suggests the need to improve our anesthetic techniques when performing eustachian tube and lumen procedures. Due to being awake during the operation, pain and discomfort could be generated from mucosal sensory, mechanical, or stretch receptors within the lumen of the cartilaginous eustachian tube (ET) or middle ear. This neuronal reflex arc also has the potential to trigger vasovagal responses [16]. Therefore, to reduce pain, Joonas et al suggested the rate of inflation not exceed 1 atm/s [17].

Compared with the general anesthesia group, postoperative VAS scores were slightly lower in the local anesthesia group. Under local anesthesia with MAC, the intraoperation procedures were tolerable, whereas the postoperative pain gradually increased after the analgesic effects subsided. Therefore, VAS scores after surgery were slightly but not significantly different between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Blood loss in both groups was less than 5 ml, and differences in postoperative ETDQ-7 scores between the groups were insignificant (P>0.05). Moreover, differences in short-term efficacy between the groups were insignificant, suggesting that anesthesia was not the main factor affecting the operation results. The procedure under general anesthesia was performed for about 120 min, which was longer than the 40 min under local anesthesia. Therefore, treatments under local anesthesia take less time and are associated with fewer postoperative complications such as nausea and vomiting [18].

Regarding the order of BET and TBI during the procedure, some operators believe that TBI should be performed before BET [19]. The reasoning behind this view is that removing the effusion or secretion in the tympanic cavity may balance the pressure between the external and middle ear. The middle ear could be in a negative pressure state caused by ETD, and if BET is performed first, the pressure in the middle ear cavity will change sharply when the balloon catheter is expanded in the eustachian tube lumen. However, whether performing TBI first followed by BET will affect the inner ear is still not clear. In this study, BET was performed first, followed by TBI, in the local anesthesia group. During the dilation process, the patient was clearly conscious and instructed to perform the Valsalva maneuver, which could indicate the patency of the eustachian tube.

Treatment costs are an important consideration in modern health practice. Surgery under local anesthesia with MAC, rather than general anesthesia, usually saves costs [20]. In this feasibility study, local anesthesia was performed in the operation room for monitoring. The anesthesiologist was on stand-by and constantly monitored the patients prepared for sedation. From the beginning of local anesthesia to the end of the operation, the average time consumed was about 49±17.26 min. Patients in the local anesthesia group experienced inapparent adverse reactions; therefore, anesthesia should be done in the preparation room before the patients enter the operating room. This will reduce the anesthesiologist’s time in the operating room by about 20 min, thereby reducing treatment costs [21]. Based on our findings, we believe that patients under the current local anesthetic scheme experienced some pain and discomfort, and some of them required intravenous drugs to relieve pain. Therefore, we do not recommend surgery without an intravenous approach.

The number of patients in this preliminary study was limited. While the local anesthesia group had no significant adverse reactions, we cannot rule out intraoperative pain and possible vagus reactions due to significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure. A patient was reported for the first time to experience bradycardia (heart rate of 30 beats per min) during BET under local anesthesia at the University of Helsinki hospital, which was relieved by intravenous atropine administration [12]. Therefore, we recommend proper intraoperative monitoring and intravenous access for BET under local anesthesia until more patients are safely treated and anesthetic procedures are improved. In addition, the high VAS score in the local anesthesia group indicated that some patients could still sense pain during the operation, suggesting that local anesthesia and operation approaches need further improvements.

Conclusions

BET+TBI under local anesthesia with MAC for treatment of refractory otitis media with effusion is feasible and safe. However, under the current program, patients still feel slight pain and discomfort, indicating the need to improve it. Clinically, BET is a potentially effective therapeutic approach, but further investigations are needed to improve pain control and vagal reactions.

References

1. Liang M, Xiong H, Cai Y, Effect of the combination of balloon Eustachian tuboplasty and tympanic paracentesis on intractable chronic otitis media with effusion: Am J Otolaryngol, 2016; 37; 442-46

2. Atkinson H, Wallis S, Coatesworth AP, Otitis media with effusion: Postgrad Med, 2015; 127; 381-85

3. Adil E, Poe D, What is the full range of medical and surgical treatments available for patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction?: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014; 22; 8-15

4. Schroder S, Lehmann M, Ebmeyer J, Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty: A retrospective cohort study: Clin Otolaryngol, 2015; 40; 629-38

5. Poe DS, Hanna BM, Balloon dilation of the cartilaginous portion of the eustachian tube: Initial safety and feasibility analysis in a cadaver model: Am J Otolaryngol, 2011; 32; 115-23

6. Randrup TS, Ovesen T, Balloon eustachian tuboplasty: A systematic review: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015; 152; 383-92

7. Ockermann T, Reineke U, Upile T, Balloon dilation eustachian tuboplasty: A feasibility study: Otol Neurotol, 2010; 31; 1100-3

8. Silvola J, Kivekas I, Poe DS, Balloon dilation of the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014; 151; 125-30

9. Meyer TA, O’Malley EM, Schlosser RJ, A randomized controlled trial of balloon dilation as a treatment for persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction with 1-year follow-up: Otol Neurotol, 2018; 39; 894-902

10. Chen X, Xie L, Zeng H, Local versus general anesthesia for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube: A single-center retrospective study in a Chinese population: Ear Nose Throat J, 2020 [Online ahead of print]

11. Catalano PJ, Jonnalagadda S, Yu VM, Balloon catheter dilatation of Eustachian tube: A preliminary study: Otol Neurotol, 2012; 33; 1549-52

12. Luukkainen V, Kivekäs I, Hammarén-Malmi S, Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty under local anesthesia: Is it feasible?: Laryngoscope, 2017; 127; 1021-25

13. Van Roeyen S, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Responsiveness of the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire: J Int Adv Otol, 2016; 12; 106-8

14. Yin G, Tan J, Li P, Balloon dilation of Eustachian tube combined with tympanostomy tube insertion and middle ear pressure equalization therapy for recurrent secretory otitis media: J Otol, 2019; 14; 101-5

15. Luukkainen V, Jero J, Sinkkonen ST, Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty under monitored anaesthesia care with different balloon dilation devices: A pilot feasibility study with 18 patients: Clin Otolaryngol, 2019; 44; 87-90

16. Songu M, Aslan A, Unlu HH, Celik O, Neural control of eustachian tube function: Laryngoscope, 2009; 119; 1198-202

17. Toivonen J, Dean M, Kawai K, Poe D, Comparison of outcomes for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under local vs general anesthesia: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2022; 7; 1120-28

18. Chan W, Fahlbusch D, Dhillon P, Selva D, Assisted local anesthesia for powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Orbit, 2014; 33; 416-20

19. Li L, Mao Y, Hu N, The effect of balloon dilatation eustachian tuboplasty combined with grommet insertion on the structure and function of the Eustachian tube in patients with refractory otitis media with effusion: Ann Palliat Med, 2021; 10; 7662-70

20. Locke MC, Davis JC, Brothers RJ, Love WE, Assessing the outcomes, risks, and costs of local versus general anesthesia: A review with implications for cutaneous surgery: J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018; 78; 983-88e984

21. Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M, Understanding costs of care in the Operating Room: JAMA Surg, 2018; 153; e176233

SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

29 March 2023 : Editorial  

Editorial: Effective Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatments Support Global and National Programs to Eliminate H...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940519  

30 March 2023 : Clinical Research  

An Online Survey on the Relationship Between Positive Coping and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) of M...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939485  

09 February 2023 : Clinical Research  

Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health in 729 Medical Students in Indonesia During ...

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e938892

In Press

30 Mar 2023 : Clinical Research  

An Online Survey on the Relationship Between Positive Coping and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms (PTSS) of M...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939485  

30 Mar 2023 : Database Analysis  

Global Research Trends and Hotspots in Lateral Epicondylitis During the Past 30 Years: A Bibliometric and V...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939309  

29 Mar 2023 : Editorial  

Editorial: Effective Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatments Support Global and National Programs to Eliminate H...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940519  

29 Mar 2023 : Laboratory Research  

Preparation, Physicochemical Properties, and Structural Characterization of Resistant Starch-Aspirin-Loaded...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939711  

Most Viewed Current Articles

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research  

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

30 Dec 2021 : Clinical Research  

Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis o...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935379

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935379

08 Mar 2022 : Review article  

A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Man...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.936292

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936292

01 Jan 2022 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750